Citation Details


Back to citations


Section: 56.12004
Date: 05/21/2015
District:
Negligence: Moderate
Injury or Illness: Reasonbly Likely
Injury or illness could be expected to be: Lost Workdays or Restricted Only
Significant and Substantial: Yes

Condition or Practice: The conduit containing the conductors that supplied the 240v power to the 6A
conveyor motor was corroded exposing the inner conductors to mechanical
damage. There was approximately 18 foot of corroded conduit. There was a 6
inch by 6 inch junction box near the tail pulley supported by the corroded
conduit that had the bottom half missing presenting the possibility of the
inner conductors resting on the angle iron support. The area is accessed daily
during production for inspection and clean up purposes. Employees were exposed
to the possibility of injury from shock/fire should the inner conductors
become damaged. No bare copper wire was observed. The mine operator was not
informed of the condition.

Action to Terminate: The mine operator had the corroded conduit replaced with new
conduit and fittings.

Why this concerns you: Be further advised that with respect to citation 8841971 I wish to explain why I not
only don't see this as significant and substantial, but not even a citation. This should
have been a suggestion for us to fix before firing up the plant. This particular issue
absolutely could have been either caused or accelerated as a result of the harsh
winter conditions. No miners life has been put in danger as a result of this issue and
I know that we would have caught this. With a plant that has pieces of equipment as
old as this one we often see issues like this in the spring of the year that need to be
addressed. We were not afforded that opportunity. And certainly this is not
Significant and Substantial when we didn't have that chance and no one was
exposed to it.



Abatement Suggestions From Industry


My only comment/question is? Was the plant up and running in a production mode at the time of the inspection? If so, you should have done a proper workplace examination of the equipment and wiring. The only leg you have to stand on to appeal these, is if the plant had not produced any material yet this season and was still locked and tagged out from over the winter shut-down.
- posted on 06/01/2015


Post a Comment


We have provided a place where you can post your professional comment or add additional information regarding this citation. Before doing so, please read the following guidelines:

Be nice!
If you are angry, step back and take a breath.

Post like you are talking to someone face-to-face. Better yet, post it like your mother is going to read it.

Don't discuss anything that might be construed as restraining trade. Nothing about boycotts and we certainly don't want to read about the price of rock.


Be honest!
Keep it factual. There is absolutely no need to exaggerate; some citations are hard enough to believe as is. Mine safety is important and those who visit the site must be able to rely on posts being accurate.


We review all posts
Sorry, but all posts come to us first. We want this site to be effective, and we want you to use it. The site can only be effective if it is legal and professional. If we get something that isn't both, we won't post it. None of us want that to happen.


No Guarantees
Anyone who has been a mine safety professional for long knows what one inspector approves, another may consider a violation. As much as we would like to, we cannot guarantee any solution offered here will work for your situation. We certainly hope what others have done provides helpful ideas, but we aren't willing to bet the farm on it passing an inspection and you shouldn't either.


Your name and email will not be shown when you post your comment. We ask for these fields because it helps us identify association members and keeps spam off the website.

Your Name

Your Email

Member Of

*

Comment


Any comments or opinions shown on this website reflect the views and opinions of the individuals or organization who posted them and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of the parties sponsoring or supporting this website. The sponsors are not responsible for the content of any comment posted on this website.