Citation Details


Back to citations


Section: 56.12004
Date: 11/05/2010
District: NC
Negligence: Moderate
Injury or Illness: Unlikely
Injury or illness could be expected to be: Lost Workdays or Restricted Only
Significant and Substantial: No

Condition or Practice: During inspection of the shop building Lincoln Idealarc 250 located at the west wall an electrical conductor was found with no mechanical protection. The stinger end protection had been damaged to the point of exposing bare metal around the tip for an area of approximately 2 inches high x 4 inches long. The approximately 80 - 90 no load voltages expose miners to an electrical shock and burn injury should the condition continue. Employees use the welder/stinger on an as needed basis. The cable was not connected to the welder at the time of discovery.

Action to Terminate: The operator replaced the damaged stinger

Why this concerns you: The exposed jaws of the stinger present no more hazard than a welding electrode being held in the stinger jaws. The inspector staetes that the cable/stinger was not in use, and wasn't attached to the welder. Her assumption of "80 - 90 no load volts" is speculative because the voltage would be based on the amp setting on the welder, assuming the cable would be attached to the welder, and not discovered during a pre-shift exam of the welder/cable.



Abatement Suggestions From Industry


There are no abatements posted for this citation. Add your suggestion below.


Post a Comment


We have provided a place where you can post your professional comment or add additional information regarding this citation. Before doing so, please read the following guidelines:

Be nice!
If you are angry, step back and take a breath.

Post like you are talking to someone face-to-face. Better yet, post it like your mother is going to read it.

Don't discuss anything that might be construed as restraining trade. Nothing about boycotts and we certainly don't want to read about the price of rock.


Be honest!
Keep it factual. There is absolutely no need to exaggerate; some citations are hard enough to believe as is. Mine safety is important and those who visit the site must be able to rely on posts being accurate.


We review all posts
Sorry, but all posts come to us first. We want this site to be effective, and we want you to use it. The site can only be effective if it is legal and professional. If we get something that isn't both, we won't post it. None of us want that to happen.


No Guarantees
Anyone who has been a mine safety professional for long knows what one inspector approves, another may consider a violation. As much as we would like to, we cannot guarantee any solution offered here will work for your situation. We certainly hope what others have done provides helpful ideas, but we aren't willing to bet the farm on it passing an inspection and you shouldn't either.


Your name and email will not be shown when you post your comment. We ask for these fields because it helps us identify association members and keeps spam off the website.

Your Name

Your Email

Member Of

*

Comment


Any comments or opinions shown on this website reflect the views and opinions of the individuals or organization who posted them and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of the parties sponsoring or supporting this website. The sponsors are not responsible for the content of any comment posted on this website.