Citation Details


Back to citations


Section: 56.14100c / 56.14132a / 56.14101a2 / 56.14100c
Date: 04/28/2011
District: NC
Negligence: High
Injury or Illness: Unlikely
Injury or illness could be expected to be: Lost Workdays or Restricted Only
Significant and Substantial: No

Condition or Practice: Citation #1
The brake lights on the Fiatallis FC 85 was not functional at time of inspection, This condition exposes operator of other equipment to the hazard of not having a warning when the grader makes sudden stops. which could result in injuries to both operators.

Citation #2
The horn nor the back up alarm was working on the Fiatallis FC 85 road grader. This condition give no warning to other equipment or miners in the area. this condition exposes miners to the hazards of be run into.

Citation #3
The parking brake on the Fiatallis FC 85 road grader used to grade road ways on the mine site was not functional at time of inspection. This condition exposes the operator of the hazard of the brakes not holding in the event of an emergency.

Citation #4
The tie rod end on the left side of the Fiatallis FC 85 road grader had movement by hand of 1/4 to 3/8 of an inch up and down. This condition exposes the operator to the hazard of loosing control of the grader, causing injury to the operator.

Action to Terminate: Removed Fiatallis FC 85 from site.

Why this concerns you: The reason this concerns us is that this equipment was tagged out with a sign on the door handle indicating this equipment was "out of service". The inspector continued to push the issue of doing an inspection of this equipment due to it being on site. After much discussion we had an employee do a walk around inspection, during which he recorded all the safety and mechanical issues that were found. All issues were documented during the walk around and it was determined by the miner that the equipment could not be operated until all of the issues were corrected. Even after all this effort to convince the inspector that we would not, could not, and should not operate this equipment until corrections were made, the inspector proceeded to write 4 citations related to this out of service piece of equipment. Only after we removed the equipment from the site did the inspector terminate the citations.
Inspectors should not have the authority to push through procedures that were in place with the intent to write citations on items that were already noted by the miners as needing correction.



Abatement Suggestions From Industry


Did you have documentation as to why the equipment had been put out of service? Under 56.14100(d) if a correction cannot be made immeadiately it must be recorded and kept on site until the defect has been corrected. This prevents operators from tagging out equipment while MSHA is there to avoid inspection.


- posted on 04/29/2011


Post a Comment


We have provided a place where you can post your professional comment or add additional information regarding this citation. Before doing so, please read the following guidelines:

Be nice!
If you are angry, step back and take a breath.

Post like you are talking to someone face-to-face. Better yet, post it like your mother is going to read it.

Don't discuss anything that might be construed as restraining trade. Nothing about boycotts and we certainly don't want to read about the price of rock.


Be honest!
Keep it factual. There is absolutely no need to exaggerate; some citations are hard enough to believe as is. Mine safety is important and those who visit the site must be able to rely on posts being accurate.


We review all posts
Sorry, but all posts come to us first. We want this site to be effective, and we want you to use it. The site can only be effective if it is legal and professional. If we get something that isn't both, we won't post it. None of us want that to happen.


No Guarantees
Anyone who has been a mine safety professional for long knows what one inspector approves, another may consider a violation. As much as we would like to, we cannot guarantee any solution offered here will work for your situation. We certainly hope what others have done provides helpful ideas, but we aren't willing to bet the farm on it passing an inspection and you shouldn't either.


Your name and email will not be shown when you post your comment. We ask for these fields because it helps us identify association members and keeps spam off the website.

Your Name

Your Email

Member Of

*

Comment


Any comments or opinions shown on this website reflect the views and opinions of the individuals or organization who posted them and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of the parties sponsoring or supporting this website. The sponsors are not responsible for the content of any comment posted on this website.