Citation Details


Back to citations


Section: 46.9b2
Date: 04/29/2011
District: SC
Negligence: Low
Injury or Illness: No Likelihood
Injury or illness could be expected to be: No Lost Workdays
Significant and Substantial: No

Condition or Practice: The records for the most recent annual refresher training completed on xx/xx/2011 did not indicate the type (Part 46) or time duration (8 hours) on the 5000-23 form. This is a records violation and has no gravity.

Action to Terminate: The required information was added to the training form.

Why this concerns you: First, this citation has no relation to the safety or health of any miner. Second, the appropriate MSHA Form 5000-23 was used (Taken from the MSHA Website - completely filled out). A Company addendum form was also completed (accompanied the training certificates) identifying the type of training (as identified under the Part 46 written program), actual training topics, competent persons performing the training and actual time of the training (broken out per topic and totaling over 8 hours), but the inspector decided to issue a citation anyway because "Part 46" and "8 Hours" were not printed on the 5000-23 form.



Abatement Suggestions From Industry


Fight it. 46.9 states that you must record on an MSHA 5000-23 OR (emphasis OR) a form that has the other information. If you record it on a 5000-23, and the 5000-23 doesn't have a box for something, that's MSHA's problem. The law requires you use the 5000-23 OR a form LIKE the 5000-23, with all the information in the rest of the statute.
- posted on 04/29/2011


Post a Comment


We have provided a place where you can post your professional comment or add additional information regarding this citation. Before doing so, please read the following guidelines:

Be nice!
If you are angry, step back and take a breath.

Post like you are talking to someone face-to-face. Better yet, post it like your mother is going to read it.

Don't discuss anything that might be construed as restraining trade. Nothing about boycotts and we certainly don't want to read about the price of rock.


Be honest!
Keep it factual. There is absolutely no need to exaggerate; some citations are hard enough to believe as is. Mine safety is important and those who visit the site must be able to rely on posts being accurate.


We review all posts
Sorry, but all posts come to us first. We want this site to be effective, and we want you to use it. The site can only be effective if it is legal and professional. If we get something that isn't both, we won't post it. None of us want that to happen.


No Guarantees
Anyone who has been a mine safety professional for long knows what one inspector approves, another may consider a violation. As much as we would like to, we cannot guarantee any solution offered here will work for your situation. We certainly hope what others have done provides helpful ideas, but we aren't willing to bet the farm on it passing an inspection and you shouldn't either.


Your name and email will not be shown when you post your comment. We ask for these fields because it helps us identify association members and keeps spam off the website.

Your Name

Your Email

Member Of

*

Comment


Any comments or opinions shown on this website reflect the views and opinions of the individuals or organization who posted them and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of the parties sponsoring or supporting this website. The sponsors are not responsible for the content of any comment posted on this website.