Citation Details


Back to citations


Section: 56.14100b
Date: 06/27/2011
District: NC
Negligence: Low
Injury or Illness: Reasonably Likely
Injury or illness could be expected to be: Lost Workdays or Restricted Only
Significant and Substantial: Yes

Condition or Practice: The stop/brake lights provided on the Cat 988 F front end loader S/N 8YG----- are not functional at this time. The front end loader is operating in the pit area of the mine loading material into the primary crusher. Two other haul trucks are operating in the pit area to access load out bins on the north side of the crushing plant. This exposes a person operating the other mobile equipment to the hazard of not being alerted to the front end loader stopping causing a collision which could result in strain or sprain injuries.

Action to Terminate: Fixed the brake lights.

Why this concerns you: The truck and loader in this citation were in the same crushing operation but not traveling on the same path when the citation was written. The loader in question travels at a speed of 4.3 mph in first gear, and 7.5 mph in second gear during load and carry operations. The loader is 13'7" high, 12'5" wide and weighs 100,000 lbs. If a person approaching the rear of this vehicle cannot see it slowing down at these speeds they should not be behind the wheel. The two little specks of red called brake lights get covered with dust and mud in quarry conditions. What is next, dome light out S&S, or maybe a low tire S&S? It is not about safety anymore.



Abatement Suggestions From Industry


There are no abatements posted for this citation. Add your suggestion below.


Post a Comment


We have provided a place where you can post your professional comment or add additional information regarding this citation. Before doing so, please read the following guidelines:

Be nice!
If you are angry, step back and take a breath.

Post like you are talking to someone face-to-face. Better yet, post it like your mother is going to read it.

Don't discuss anything that might be construed as restraining trade. Nothing about boycotts and we certainly don't want to read about the price of rock.


Be honest!
Keep it factual. There is absolutely no need to exaggerate; some citations are hard enough to believe as is. Mine safety is important and those who visit the site must be able to rely on posts being accurate.


We review all posts
Sorry, but all posts come to us first. We want this site to be effective, and we want you to use it. The site can only be effective if it is legal and professional. If we get something that isn't both, we won't post it. None of us want that to happen.


No Guarantees
Anyone who has been a mine safety professional for long knows what one inspector approves, another may consider a violation. As much as we would like to, we cannot guarantee any solution offered here will work for your situation. We certainly hope what others have done provides helpful ideas, but we aren't willing to bet the farm on it passing an inspection and you shouldn't either.


Your name and email will not be shown when you post your comment. We ask for these fields because it helps us identify association members and keeps spam off the website.

Your Name

Your Email

Member Of

*

Comment


Any comments or opinions shown on this website reflect the views and opinions of the individuals or organization who posted them and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of the parties sponsoring or supporting this website. The sponsors are not responsible for the content of any comment posted on this website.